A Brief Look at Trespass to Land

exfacie's picture
Submitted by exfacie on Sat, 09/17/2011 - 14:44

This article provides a brief look at the offence of trespass to land within the Commonwealth of Australia. It is intended only as a starting point for further investigation and discussion, and is not in any way an authoritative treatise on the topic.

Trespass

Trespass is an offence under tort law / common law. Various forms of trespass exist, according to Halsbury's Laws of Australia these include:

  • Trespass to the person
  • Trespass to goods
  • Trespass to land

In the case of the latter, this may also include trespass to land and subsoil, or to airspace. In reference to land Halsbury's Laws of Australia states:

Trespass may be committed not only by a direct intrusion on to the surface of land or into a building, but also by a direct interference with rights relating to land which permit the plaintiff to exclude others, such as the right to cut timber or the right of fishing. It is also trespass to intrude into the subsoil of the plaintiff's property, whether by excavation or tunnelling. The occupier of the surface of the land has substantial control over the subterranean space beneath the surface to a considerable depth. [410-495]

The publication also states:

Every unjustified entry directly by a person on land in the possession of another, which is carried out either intentionally or negligently, is an actionable trespass, even though no damage is done thereby. For example, a trespass occurs where a person wrongfully sets foot on or causes soil to fall on another's property, places a ladder against or drives nails into another's wall, breaks a fence on the property or removes a door. [415-480]

Hence, no damage is required for one to take action against trespassers. In relation to classification it also states:

The various torts derived from the action for trespass protect three distinct interests:

  1. bodily integrity;
  2. possession of goods;
  3. rights in the possession of land.

Protection of bodily integrity is provided by teh separate torts of battery, assault and wrongful false inprisonment. The possession of goods finds protection in the tort of trespass to goods. The right to possession of land is protected by the action for trespass to land. [415-320]

Defences to Trespass to Land

Halsbury's Laws of Australia states the following, and only the following, as lawful defences to trespass to land.

1. Consent

If you provide consent for somone to enter a property then it is not an act of trespass [415-525]. One needs to be aware that such consent may be provided or implied in a contract (written or otherwise).

2. Necessity

Only two claims of necessity are provided by the publication [415-530]:

  • Preservation or protection of life, and
  • Preservation of the property of the defendant or possibly of others.

3. Ejection and re-entry to land

Where a person in possession of the land, or is entitled to immediate possession to the land, may eject another person with no lawful right to be there. Generally, this is the case where a tenant may be evicted from a property [415-535].
 
4. Entry to retake goods
 
Halsbury's Laws of Australia states:
 
... only if they were taken there or wrongfully detained by the owner of the land, or had been stolen and placed on the land with the consent of the owner of the land. However, in order to rely upon this defence, the alleged interference with possession giving rise to this right must have been wrongful from its inception. A person is only entitled to rely upon this defence if the otherwise trespassory entry was the only reasonable method available for effecting the repossession of the goods. [415-540]
 
It is apparent that the retaking of goods must be in connection with a wrong associated with those goods (i.e., theft).
 
5. Abatement of nuisance
 
This justification applies when, "... after giving due notice, to abate a nuisance emanating from that property" [415-545].
 
6. Lawful authority
 
Halsbury's Laws of Australia only gives two reasons for lawful authority within the State of Victoria, at common law [415-550]:
  • To prevent the commission of murder (any person), and
  • To prevent a breach of the peace (only a police officer).
However, there may be other defences in relation to investigation of criminal offences.
 
Trespass in relation to smart meter installation
 
It is the author's interpretation of the law as stated in Halsbury's Laws of Australia that the only justifiable entry for installation of a smart meter is by consent. If you make it clear that you do not consent to entry for the installation of a smart meter, and have no contractual obligation to allow such action, that any such installation is, ex facie, a clear cut case of trespass to land.
 
References
  1. Halsbury's Laws of Australia, Tort, Paragraph 415-320 to 415-550 (update from July 2011).